JackSilver

Chuck Klosterman writes that probability is bullshit. Things either happen or they don’t. There may exist varying degrees – but empirically – the end result is one of the two. While I tend to think Klosterman is full of shit. I have not been able to let go of the fact that he may actually have a point here. For those of you who know me – you know that I am constantly perplexed by the fabulosity of the universe… which is the nicest way of saying that I usually so deep in thought that I am prone to hurting myself. I have written many a journal about my thoughts regarding existence and reality and fate and such…

In a year of fallen angels Broken hands and boys in danger Pray the lord might pacify you Ain't no telling what he's up to … Some assumptions leading us down the rabbit hole: The key to any successful con* (term to be defined below) is the first impression. A positive first impression requires charisma. Charisma is only achieved by means of a hyperactive self-confidence. Self-confidence is usually obtained through successful experience. So the key to any successful con* (term to be defined below) is to obtain success be means of previous cons*. Seems circular. Seems odd. Let’s apply it. If our identity is defined by mea